Home  |  Hi-Fi Audio Reviews  Audiophile Shows Partner Mags  News       



Enjoy the Music.com Review Magazine
Dmitri Shostakovich
Symphony No. 8 in C minor, Op. 65
Valery Gergiev conducting the Mariinsky Orchestra

Symphony No. 8 in C minor, Op. 65
Vasily Petrenko conducting the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra

Review By Max Westler



  What we have here are two versions of the Shostakovich Eighth Symphony, taken from ongoing cycles currently competing for your attention. As of this writing, Petrenko is only one symphony shy of completing his cycle, whereas Gergiev still has a ways to go in his. I should probably have waited for both cycles to be completed before comparing them; but I'm not sure how many more reviews of Shostakovich symphonies I have left in me. Besides, the Eighth makes a useful and revealing point of comparison. Along with the First, the Fifth, and the Tenth, it's one of the composer's greatest achievements in the form; and of those four works, it's probably the hardest to bring off.

A friend once usefully distinguished between "militarized" and "demilitarized" interpretations of Shostakovich symphonies. A "militarized" approach is one that takes into account the historical and biographical context in which the symphonies were written. Shostakovich survived many upheavals: the Bolshevik revolution, the Stalinist purges, the nightmare of the Second World War, the siege of Leningrad, and the cultural repression of the post-war years. Stalin had personally censored Shostakovich after the premiere of his opera Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District in 1936. The review that appeared in Pravda ("Music or Muddle?") might have been written by a party hack, but it bore the full weight of Stalin's disapproval. Stalin seemed to take a sadistic delight in terrorizing Shostakovich. The threat was constant and real: several of the composer's fellow artists and friends had already been quietly "disappeared." During the darkest days of the purge, he kept a suitcase packed, just in case; but mercifully, the midnight knock on the door never came.

The publication of Testimony in 1979 at once complicated and amplified the "militarized" point of view. Claiming to be the memoirs of Shostakovich "as related to and edited by" the young musicologist Solomon Volkov, the book suggested that the inspiration for many of Shostakovich's most familiar works had been his animus for both Stalin and the brutal system he represented. The Fifth Symphony, fir example, was not "a Soviet artist's creative response to justified criticism," a form of public apology and penance for the "formalism" of Lady Macbeth. It was not meant to be the affirmative work the authorities expected, but an "irreparable tragedy," a portrait of a system that ground the human spirit to ashes. The ending of the last movement, typically played as exultant, was, on the contrary, anything but. As Shostakovich says in Testimony, "the rejoicing is forced, created under threat. It's as if someone were beating you with a stick and saying, ‘Your business is rejoicing, your business is rejoicing,' and you rise, shaky, and go off dragging your feet, muttering, ‘Our business is rejoicing, our business is rejoicing.'"

Vasily Petrenko takes the most "militarized" interpretive stance since Mstislav Rostropovitch. The Eighth Symphony is inescapably grim, easily Shostakovich's darkest work before the last quartets. For Petrenko the opening of the first movement is all grim foreboding, the first act of an "irreparable tragedy." He tightens the coil gradually, but relentlessly until it explodes in an outburst of anguish and despair. The allegretto is deliberately bloated, disruptive, and parodistic—laughter that cuts like a razorblade. The allegro that follows is terrifying, the remorseless grinding of an infernal machine, then a mad hatter trumpet call to mass slaughter. In the Eighth, the question has always been, do we at least get some sunlight, some redemption, in the concluding allegretto? Not surprisingly, with Petrenko, the answer is most definitely "No!" For Petrenko, the darkness is impenetrable and unrelieved.

Though Gergiev surely knows all the history, he characteristically takes a more individual approach. He's very much "demilitarized." Gergiev has always been a "hands-on" interpreter: whatever work he's conducting isn't going to sound much like anybody else's version. In Shostakovich, he employs a host of expressive devices that Petrenko scrupulously avoids. Whereas Petrenko is relentless and deliberate, Gergiev often adjusts the tempo: pushing forward here, pulling back there. Whereas Petrenko's textures are lean and gunmetal grey, Gergiev favors a dark, bass-heavy sound. In the Eighth, Gergiev is less relentless in that first movement, more "weighty." In the second and third movements, his self-conscious tempo adjustments occasionally slow the momentum. And in the end, he does provide the "happy ending" that Petrenko denies us.

If forced to choose between these two approaches, I'd go with Petrenko. But I hasten to add that Gergiev's performance has a lot going for it. It's certainly more robust, operatic, and in some cases more dramatic than Petrenko's. The Mariinsky Orchestra may not be the St. Petersburg, but under Gergiev's baton, they're capable of wonders; and here the playing is virtuosic, dazzling.  Then again, the Royal Liverpool band also plays magnificently; which is perhaps even more impressive given what Petrenko demands of them. The difference in sound reflects the difference in interpretive approach. Naxos gives us a more distant perspective with a very natural soundstage; Mariinsky is close up, in your face. With Petrenko, you've got a balcony seat; with Gergiev, you're in the first row of the orchestra. Make no mistake: Gergiev and Petrenko both have much to offer. But be forewarned: they're very, very different. Petrenko's tragic vision is totally uncompromising. Gergiev casts the symphony in a more conventional, Romantic mold: struggle followed by triumph.

One final issue: Gergiev grunts, audibly. He usually does so launching into moments of extreme tension. This might bother some, and others (many others I suspect) not at all. Gergiev is hardly the first well-known musician to add extramusical sounds to his performances: Glenn Gould hummed, Rudolph Serkin thumped, Charles Munch whooshed. Full disclosure: I've been known to hum, thump, and whoosh while listening, sometimes all at the same time. But I've never grunted. Not even once. Just so you know.











Sound Quality:















































Quick Links

Premium Audio Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews


Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc
Superior Audio Gear Reviews


Our Featured Videos


Show Reports
Montreal Audiofest 2024 Report

Southwest Audio Fest 2024
Florida Intl. Audio Expo 2024
Capital Audiofest 2023 Report
Toronto Audiofest 2023 Report
UK Audio Show 2023 Report
Pacific Audio Fest 2023 Report
T.H.E. Show 2023 Report
HIGH END Munich 2023
Australian Hi-Fi Show 2023 Report
AXPONA 2023 Show Report
...More Show Reports


Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty



Industry & Music News

High-End Premium Audio & Music News


Partner Print Magazines
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
hi-fi+ Magazine
Sound Practices
VALVE Magazine


For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics





Home   |   Hi-Fi Audio Reviews   |   News   |   Press Releases   |   About Us   |   Contact Us


All contents copyright©  1995 - 2024  Enjoy the Music.com®
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.