Home | Audio Reviews | Audio Shows | Partner Mags | News     

 

Enjoy the Music.com
HIFICRITIC
Volume 8 No. 2

Krell KSA50 Amplifier Revisited
Martin Colloms tries out Krell's Classic 1983 Class A Reference Power Amplifier.
Review By Martin Colloms


Krell KSA50 Amplifier

 

  Experienced audio engineer Dan D'Agostino, along with his wife Rondi, started Krell back in 1980. His first product was the very substantial KSA100, which decorated a natural alloy case with massive handles and gold-plated flatheaded screws, and featured full Class A operation with constant output bias current over the power range. This was followed in 1982 by the smaller and more affordable KSA50, of comparable finish and build quality. I owned and enjoyed one of these fine transistor amplifiers in the 1980s, and its ability to drive a pair of Magneplanar MG3as with their delightful full height pure aluminium ribbon tweeters was especially memorable.

Some months ago Jon Honeyball lent HIFICRITIC a recently reconditioned KSA50, and for the first time I decided to measure the standing power draw from the mains. This came out at 339W (456VA), which is sufficient (with some to spare) to meet true Class A conditions for two 8ohms 50W channels (no lies; no pack drill).

An issue I wanted to confront during this reassessment concerns my sound quality scoring system. Back then it was limited to a 10 point scale: 4 was considered near useless; 9.9 was near perfect; and the good stuff tended to be found in a narrow band between 6.5 and 8.5. I now wanted to try and work out how that scaling could be related to my current open-ended arrangement which puts fine amplifiers at above 50 points. How would the old, if recently re-capacitored example rate on the present basis? It was certain to be above my historic, 'capped' 1983 score of a reference level 9.7.

A brief lab test was carried out to make sure the amplifier was in fine working order. I measured 95W plus 95W into 8 ohms, 170W plus 170W into 4 ohms; both channels showed fairly low distortion and noise at -76dB, and the distortion was desirably low harmonic order, as should be expected from Class A operation. The frequency response was flat and a very wide -0.05dB at 10Hz and -0.5dB by 73kHz, and channel balance was accurate. High frequency intermodulation was also very good at -82dB for 1W and -70dB at full power. These were very similar to my original results for a different sample.

After running in for a few days, the Avel Lindberg toroidal transformer was almost silent. The amplifier was well warmed up for critical comparisons, and was certainly no disgrace. The still quiet fan blew downwards so the hot part of the heatsink underneath the unit was at about 50ºC.

Krell KSA50 AmplifierFirst impressions were of generous and easy power delivery with a nicely weighted bass line and a smooth and well integrated treble. (Many older amps can sound a bit rough by today's standards.) Sibilants were clean and well focused, and transparency and image depth were both quite good. With time we became more aware of a faintly 'processed' treble quality, and some more general compression of dynamics and expression. When compared with more recent contenders, bass rhythms tended to be somewhat slower and more downbeat.

Conversely, the bass remains powerful and well extended, giving a fine sense of scale, and the sound quality remained stable with varying volume levels and different degrees of musical complexity, inspiring confidence. There was no significant roughness or related distortion.

All in all, the score on the current 'open' scale would be a creditable 25 marks, and the overall procedure felt a bit like reviewing an original Jaguar E-type. On this evidence at least, amplifiers have unquestionably become better over the last 30 years but this classic remains a worthy example of the art, and continues to demonstrate commendable longevity.

Thanks to Jon Honeyball for lending us his original Krell KSA50 .

 

 

Subscribe!

Click here to subscribe to HIFICRITIC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
 

Quick Links


Audiophile Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews

 

Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Preamplifiers
Amplifiers
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc
Ultra High-End Audio Reviews

 

Videos
Enjoy the Music.TV

 

Columns
Editorials By Tom Lyle
Viewpoint By Roger Skoff
Viewpoint By Steven R. Rochlin
Various Think Pieces
Manufacturer Articles


Show Reports
Salon Audio Montréal Audiofest 2023
Florida Intl. Audio Expo 2023
Capital Audiofest Show 2022
KL International AV Show 2022
Toronto Audiofest Show 2022
CanJam SoCal 2022 Show Report
Pacific Audio Fest 2022 Report
T.H.E. Show 2022 Report
HIGH END Munich 2022
AXPONA 2022 Show Report
CanJam Singapore 2022 Report
Click here for previous shows.

 

Other
Audiophile Contests
Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty

 

Resources & Information
Music Definitions
Hi-Fi Definitions

 


Daily Industry News

High-End Audio News & Information

 

Partner Print Magazines
audioXpress
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
hi-fi+ Magazine
HIFICRITIC
HiFi Media
Sound Practices
The Absolute Sound
VALVE Magazine

 

For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics

 

Contests & Our Mailing List

Our free newsletter for monthly updates & enter our contests!

 

 

    

Home   |   Industry News   |   Equipment Reviews   |   Press Releases   |   About Us   |   Contact Us

 

All contents copyright©  1995 - 2023  HighEndAudio.com and Enjoy the Music.com®
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.