Home  |  Audio Reviews  Show Reports   Partner Mags  News 

 

June 2003
Enjoy the Music.com Review Magazine
AudioDesk CD Sound Improver [Lathe]

Review by Wayne Donnelly
Click here to e-mail reviewer

AudioDesk CD Sound Improver [Lathe]

 

  A few years back, a retailer friend returning from the Las Vegas CES ( I had not attended that year) said the funniest audiophile-tweaky thing he had seen was this "CD trimmer" that shaved down the edges of a CD to make it sound better. I chuckled along with him, but as I thought about it, the premise didn't seem all that silly. After all, I had already found that just about anything you did to a CD was likely to make it sound better -- cleaner/polishers, rubber bands (or green marker) on the edges, demagnetizing gadgets, anti-static liquid -- you get the picture. 

Years earlier, my first exposure to CD sound had sent me running gratefully back to my LPs. Three or four years after that I reluctantly accepted CD as a necessary evil -- the only way to hear music that was no longer being released on vinyl. The "Perfect Sound Forever" tagline had been exposed as a joke, and designers were learning about the many factors that could affect CD sound. Many engineering types continued to assert that "bits is bits," but in listening rooms and design studios we were discovering that the mechanism that spun the disc and read those bits off the CD could make a big difference, as could the cable that carried the digital bits to the DAC, the decoding chip, etc. etc.

In this brave new millennium, digital audio/video technology has come a long way. Today's $300 CD player probably sounds better than did state-of-the-art digital components of ten years ago. And it's not just hardware; formats such as DVD and SACD that offer higher-resolution playback promise to make digital entertainment better and better. But for all that, digital sound and pictures still begin with a laser reading encoded digital information from a disc. I suspect that as long as that is the case, people will be looking for ways to improve that process, so that there will be a place for tweaks and gadgets such as the Audio Desk lathe.

 

Form and Function

The lathe is rectangular, approximately 10.5 x 7 x 6 (L x W x H in inches). On the front surface is a small rotary control for motor speed; on the rear panel are the IEC jack and an opening that appears to be for cooling. The hinged glass top opens to give access to a small belt-driven turntable equipped with a stabilizing disc a little smaller than a CD and a threaded bolt that screws down to hold the CD in place during operation. A pivoted lever holds the trimming blade; its handle protrudes from the front. In the left rear corner is an open compartment apparently intended to collect the polycarbonate trimmings. (In practice, I found that the trimmings usually wound up anywhere but in there.)

Operation is straightforward. Place a disc on the turntable shiny side up. Place the stabilizer on the disc and very firmly screw down the bolt. Turn on the motor to maximum speed. Carefully move the lever until the cutting blade contacts the CD, and gradually continue moving the lever until the stop point is reached. Turn off the motor and collect and discard the trimmings. Set the motor at a moderate speed and blacken the newly trimmed edge with the supplied marker.

The trimming process is designed to accomplish two things. It compensates for imprecisions in the manufacturing process, leaving the trimmed disc perfectly symmetrical and balanced so that the laser more easily tracks the disc without having to move back and forth constantly. In addition, the outer edge is beveled at 45 degrees. That angle, together with the blackening of the edge, significantly reduces laser scatter--random reflections from the laser that can negatively affect the precision of the laser reading the CD.

 

My Way

If, like me, you don't have a convenient place to permanently install the CD lathe, no problem--it is sufficiently small, light and self-contained to use just about anywhere. Sometimes I find myself listening to a CD that just doesn't sound the way I think it should. The first order of business is to reverse electrical polarity (or phase, if you prefer). That's easy enough if you have a polarity switch on your DAC or preamplifier. But if like many audio systems yours does not provide for polarity switching, you probably won't bother to do it by reversing electrical plugs or speaker connections. I probably wouldn't. But I digress. 

I usually perform the next two steps together. First is a quick cleaning/polishing of the playing surface. I have used various products for that task, and they have mostly all made the cleaned and polished CD sound at least slightly better. For the past year or so I have been using REVEAL, a polishing agent offered by Andy Bartha Audio that comes in an 18 ounce aerosol can for $35. The polishing step by itself typically improves the sound of the CD, and combining that with the use of the Audio Desk lathe has made the experience of listening to CDs more satisfactory. 

So effective is this process that I frequently choose several CDs to polish and trim in preparation for upcoming listening sessions. I find this ritual not irksome, but actually rather pleasurable. Other vinyl-oriented listeners may have a similar reaction. This method of preparing CDs is not unlike the LP-cleaning ritual that I have been performing for 20 years with my venerable VPI HW-16 record-washing machine. I guess handling them during these various operations makes the shiny little CD seem a less alien form. (This reaction is probably age-related. I can imagine younger readers who were more or less raised on CDs wondering what the heck I'm talking about here.)

 

Review Methodology

My initial approach to using the CD lathe was to choose a CD and play a telling passage from it, then polish and trim it and listen again to the same passage. Doing things that way I was pretty confident that I heard a discernible improvement--ranging from dramatic to minor--roughly four out of five times. But even for an old subjectivist double-blind-testing-be-damned reviewer like me, this was not a sufficiently structured and repeatable test. It was time for a better plan. 

I can make indistinguishable-from-the-original CD-R copies easily enough using either my standalone CD-R recorder or my spiffy new Macintosh G4. So I burned three CD-RW (so I could recycle the discs) clones each of several good-sounding and not-so-good-sounding CDs. The good ones included the Reference Recordings Bernstein disc, for judging orchestral dynamics and frequency extension; the Musical Heritage Society reissue of the Sibelius Violin Concerto, for judging spatial presentation; Bartok string quartets from the Vegh Quartet, for string instrument timbre and small-group imaging; Virtuosa Valentina, very honestly recorded solo piano from the lovely and talented Valentina Lisitsa; and soprano Renee Fleming singing the Strauss Four Last Songs. For a bad-sounding selection, I chose an early Angel CD of the Perlman/Giulini Beethoven Violin Concerto, a wonderful performance sabotaged by glassy, edgy sound. 

On the popular side I chose Alison Krauss's New Favorite, a pristinely clean and natural-sounding, mostly acoustic CD, and Emmylou Harris's Wrecking Ball, a dense, multilayered Daniel Lanois production that has challenged the resolution of every audio system I have played it on, especially the CD. 

For each of these CDs I prepared three versions: polished only, trimmed/blackened only, and polished/trimmed/blackened. I marked each type with a small colored dot on the play side, so that I couldn't see which level of treatment I was comparing to the untreated original. Making these comparisons-and keeping detailed notes, which was essential-was sufficiently tedious that I limited myself to one recording per day. The thought of either writing or making you read the details of these comparisons is too gruesome to contemplate, so I'll summarize. 

During the first tests, of all four versions of a given CD, I was gratified to find that I made only a few mis-identifications during the first round of comparison. And in almost every case, I got it right on a second round (with the CDs shuffled to change the sequence of play). 

Any one of the treatments was virtually always easy to hear as an improvement over the untreated CD, the most difficult trials being with the best-sounding (Bernstein, Sibelius, Krauss) and worst (Beethoven) CDs that were polished-only or trimmed-and-blackened-only. The fully polished/trimmed/blackened CDs were easier to distinguish. With all of the other CDs my correct hit rate was consistently above 90% with any of the various comparisons. In particular, the typically murky textures of the Emmylou Harris disc were more separated and defined than I had previously heard. 

I found those results encouraging-not as certifying my ears as "golden," but as providing empirical validation that these treatments work well enough to be worth the trouble.

 

A Word About DVD

With my visual impairment, I typically watch my 32- inch TV from a distance of about 3 feet. So, my presuming to review video would be as suspect as a one-eared reviewer-evaluating stereo. But I was curious to see if I could detect any improvements when giving the treatment to DVDs. So I embarked on a much briefer trial, using David Lynch's Blue Velvet for color and Orson Welles' Citizen Kane for black-and-white. Here, of course, I had to rely on before-and-after-treatment viewings of selected scenes. 

Even with my crummy eyesight, improvements resulting from the full treatment were fairly easily discernible. A degree of "video noise" that I had not consciously noticed before the treatment was noticeably absent after treatment. This was especially true in scenes set outdoors at night-blacker blacks and more discernible shadow details. There also seemed to be more contrast, especially in Kane. If I could detect those improvements, I imagine normally sighted viewers will be able to see even more benefits.

 

So Who Needs It?

With its $495 price tag, the CD lathe is not a casual purchase for the budget-minded. But the better-sound-at-any-cost audiophile who has already spent, say, five figures left of the decimal and up may see things differently, especially if digital playback is the mainstay of the system. To me, frankly, the price seems on the high side given the materials and fit 'n finish (let's call that an 80)-although the audible results are indeed impressive. 

I'm keeping mine, but as a reviewer I get a nice deal. Would I buy it for list? I don't know for sure, but I would probably look for a fellow audiophile or two to split the cost. That, I think, is a good approach-acquiring the machine as a shared resource for audio clubs, etc. Otherwise, the AudioDesk CD sound improver strikes me as the ideal gift-most probably self-bestowed-for the man who has everything else. This review omits the usual numerical rating chart, but I guess I'd rate Value For The Money at 75-80 as well. But you know, it's really fun watching those shavings come off the CDs, and very satisfying to hear a more natural and relaxed sound from them.

 

Company Information

Audiodesk Systeme-Glass 
Seestrasse 1
89551 Konigsbronn
Germany

E-mail: info@audiodesksysteme.de
Website: www.audiodesksysteme.de

 

US Distributor:
Ultra Systems/The Cable Company 
125 Union Square 
New Hope, PA. 18938

Voice: (215) 852-4870
Fax: (215) 862- 4871 
E-mail: fatwyre@fatwyre.com
Website: www.fatwyre.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Quick Links


Audiophile Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews

Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Preamplifiers
Amplifiers
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc

Superior Audio Archives
Ultra High-End Audio Reviews

Videos
Musician Series
Enjoy the Music.TV

Music Reviews
Classical Music
Jazz, Bluegrass, Blues, Etc.
Rock, Pop, Techno, Metal, Etc.

Columns
Editorials By Tom Lyle
Editorials By Steven R. Rochlin
Viewpoint By Roger Skoff
Audiolics Anonymous
Nearfield By Steven Stone
Various Think Pieces
Manufacturer Articles


Partner Magazines
The Absolute Sound
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
NOVO (CANADA HiFi)
hi-fi+ Magazine
HIFICRITIC
HiFi Media
Hi-Fi World
Sound Practices
VALVE Magazine

Show Reports
Capital Audiofest (CAF) 2017 CanMania
TAVES 2017 Toronto Show Report
Rocky Mountain Audio Fest 2017
CanJam 2017 Denver RMAF
LAAS 2017 Show Report
High End Munich 2017 Show Report
AXPONA 2017 Show Report
CanJam SoCal 2017 Show Report
Montreal Audio Fest 2017 Show Report
CanJam NYC 2017 Report
CES 2017 Show Report & Videos
T.H.E. Show Newport 2016
Audio Engineering Society 141 LA
CanJam London 2016 Show Report
Hong Kong AV Show Report 2016
Click here for previous shows.

Resources And Information
Music Definitions
Hi-Fi Definitions
High-End Audio Manufacture Links

 


Daily Industry News

High-End Audio News & Information

Internet Browser
Audiophile Internet Browser V12

Mobile Phone Apps
Android Audiophile App

Other
Audiophile Contests
Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty
300B Tube Comparison

For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics

Contests & Join Our Mailing List

Our free newsletter for monthly updates & enter our contests!

Our Social Media & Video Channel
     

 

 

     

Home  |  Sitemap  |  Industry News  |  Equipment / Music Reviews  |  Press Releases  |  About Us  |  Contact Us

 

All contents copyright  1995 - 2017  Enjoy the Music.com
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.