VALVE Magazine Online!
Dinkin' Around
Tech tips and other unsolicited advice.
By Dan Schmalle From VALVE Issue 12, December 1994
Hercules Vs. The Transformer
Got an H.H. Scott LT-110 (the kit version
of the 350) in the shop last week that was
misbehaving badly, just a buzz would
come out. After a couple tubes and an
alignment of the RF and IF/limiter
stages, mono sounded great, stereo
wasn't stereo and had a bunch of growlies.
When I got to the 19kHz transformer on
the multiplex board, there was no signal
coming out, and the slugs seemed to
spin freely. Ah hah! I said (actually I said Shit!). Opened up the can and realized
I was witnessing the work of the Gods.
Apparently a previous alignment had
been performed by Hercules.
Herc had adjusted the transformer with
little regard for the fact that kit type tuning
coils were apparently set and sealed
in place with wax by the mere mortals at
H.H. Scott. In attempting to adjust the
slugs he had ripped loose the four hairfine
wires coming out of the coils, along
with tearing the cardboard tube holding
them together. Two of the wires coming
from the bottom layer of the winding
were torn off flush and unrepairable.
The moral? Don't Herc on a tuning slug!
If you feel resistance, STOP. It is either
sealed in place or jammed against
something like the other slug. Either live
with it the way it's set or carefully take
apart enough covering to see what's going
on before torquing it up.
Preamp Filament Supplies
One of the most satisfying mods I've
tried lately has been increasing the capacitance
of the DC filament supply in
various preamps. You go to Raydeau
Shaque and pick up some of the 4700
mfd @ 35V caps, say four for a PAS, and
some 50V 3A 'barrel' diodes. The diodes
produce much less voltage drop
than the toxic selenium 'rectum fryer'
and give a genuine 12+ VDC to each
filament, instead of the stock 11, and the
new filter caps will stack up under the
stock clamping arrangement nicely. The
increased voltage and energy storage
seem to give much more bass and punch
to the presentation. As a guy who has
hacked PAS's to unrecognition, I heartily
recommend this as about the only mod
worth doing to them. Quite dramatic. It
made a slight difference on a Citation I
as well.
I also tried putting Zener diodes across
the supply along with the caps and diodes.
Didn't notice much difference, so I guess the brute force filter does its job.
Cables Do Sound Different
Thought I'd share a new experiment with
you here. After being told again and
again that interconnect cables do sound
different, and admitting to myself that
big fat fire hoses connecting amps and
preamps do look way cool, I decided to
come up with an alternative to the hundreds
of dollars per meter tweak bait
the dealers carry.
The bright side of cleaning up my
flooded basement with Eileen's help
yesterday was (along with having her
support to bolster me through the grossest
of the muck) finding a coil of about
30' of RG-8 coax cable that I'd scored
from some old ham's collection, sitting
high and dry out of the muck.
Well, I been thinkin' about cobblin' me
some big mother cables so I pulled it out
and set it on the bench. A couple hours
later I was back from Raydeau Shaque
with 4 PL-259 male connectors (the only
thing that will fit the 3/8" thick RG-8 at
RS), four PL-259 to BNC male adapters
(so I can still use the cables when I convert
my own stuff to BNC, which is a
much better connection than RCA), and
four gold BNC to RCA male adapters so
I get like metals connecting at the chassis/
cable interface.
After consulting the old ARRL Handbook
for proper cable end preparation,
I cobbled together one 15' cable. You
guys who have been to my shop know
that I use 12' Radio Shack interconnects
with gold ends to connect amps to preamp,
letting us use nice fat 6' short Monster
Cable speaker leads, with the audition
amps sitting between the speakers.
Thus my rationale for 15' coble to replace
my fine sounding but unacceptably
branded RS cables.
I compared the new cable with the RS by
means of a switch box with mono source
material. I switched the lead connections
to the preamp channels occasionally to eliminate sonic differences internal
to the preamp (like shitty Dynaco
pots).
Well the new cable sounded dull, compressed,
and definitely not as loud.
Compensating for gain didn't change
the dull highs. Crop! I wasted 38 bucks
on connectors!
This morning I had a revelation. The
high buck cables have a rep for being
capacitive and rolling off highs with
some equipment. The PAS has a rep for
being terribly picky about output loads.
Put it all together and you get a horrifying
picture of me running downstairs in
my bathrobe, to try the cable between
Citation Ill tuner and amp directly, bypassing
the PAS altogether.
Bingo! No rolloff, and a little more bass
and midrange presence to boot.
So was it worth the money? Not if you
use a PAS (keep your cables real short
or use a low capacitance cable), but for
$60, including the RG-8 cable, you can
have a pair of 15' cables that work with
load independent sources, look serious,
adapt to different connectors, and don't
break at the cheap terminations all the
time like the RS cables do.
My solution to the PAS problem is a passive
preamp I'm brewing from more
ham parts. But that's for next time.
-- Dan