ModWright Instruments
SWL 9.0SE Preamplifier
Giant-Killer From The Northwest!
Review By Wayne Donnelly
Click
here to e-mail reviewer.
This exciting preamplifier is
the first product to be designed and manufactured from scratch by Dan
Wright, whose ModWright operation has for years been a leading source of
high-quality modifications that turn moderately priced gear CD players
especially from mass-market marques such as Sony and Pioneer into
performers that frequently outdo the high-priced spreads, in both sound
quality and especially in price/performance value.
This writer has been a ModWright customer for some years.
First was a hot-rodded Pioneer DVD player ($180 at Costco), which Dan
returned to me with his DAC chip, digital clock and sundry other parts
upgrades, supplemented by a few Bybee quantum purifiers. I had a lot of
fun over the next couple of years embarrassing ambitious CD players and
digital separates with that little guy. About three years ago I had Dan do
his all-out "Absolute Truth" mod, including his own tube output stage and,
again, lots of Bybee device, to Sony's much-celebrated first-generation
SCD-777 ES SACD player. I had reviewed that machine in the late Ultimate
Audio magazine and had found it somewhat underwhelming, especially in
standard CD playback (swimming against the tide of numerous critical hosannas
declaring it, finally, the truly "analog-like" player we had all been
waiting for. (Since then, of course, analog-like" has become a mantra for
virtually every hot new player. Kinda makes you wonder why we're not all
still just playing LPs they're really "analog-like"!)
I had high expectations this mod was pretty pricey
but I was not prepared for the brilliant performance of the transformed
Sony. All the hype I had grown so tired of hearing was suddenly true.
Dynamics were at once bigger and more subtly delicate, covering the whole
scale. It delivered deeper, more precise bass; gloriously open and
extended highs; more palpable and precise imaging within a broader and
deeper soundscape; and best of all, virtual disappearance of the subtle
but omnipresent "digital glare" that had always overlain its musical
presentation. It was, how can I say it, almost like listening to my best
LPs! All together now...
Not only was this the best Red Book CD playback I had
heard; for the first time really I could hear what the fuss was about with
the better SACDs. And that's still true, at least during the half of every
year that the %<&*>(^!! Sony transport the only thing Dan
didn't touch works. It's a damned shame, because when it's working
this machine's transport is stellar, both in internal playback and as the
source for the exceptional Dodson DA-218 Red Book DAC against which
the Sony, by the way, can hold its own.
Back to the Present
The point of all this history yes, Virginia, there is
a point is that all those years of hands-on experience and hard-earned
knowledge of what parts cost-effectively contribute most to product
upgrades go a long way toward explaining why the SWL 9.0SE sounds so good
at its modest $2,200 price. I'm not a parts guru I don't really
understand why, say, a Vishay resistor is so good. But
acquaintances whose knowledge and abilities I trust including good
designers and engineers who have looked under the hood of this
preamplifier are impressed, not only with the parts selection but also
with the neat and clean PCB and general physical layout.
The SWL 9.0SE circuit has a Class A Mu' circuit
which Dan Wright credits to Alan Kimmel, who consulted on the design. The
two input stage tubes are NOS 5687s; Wright is very specific about
allowable tubes substitutions, and warns about damage to the circuit from
using more popular but unauthorized tubes. Given the excellent performance
of the stock tubes, which are said to be plentiful, I don't really see
this preamplifier as a prime candidate for tube-rolling.
Typically, a tube stereo line stage would figure to have
at least four tubes. Why only two here? Because this "hybrid" circuit uses
solid-state output devices. Now, before you hard-core tubists go running
for the cross and garlic, just hang on. This circuit type can offer some
advantages over all-tube topologies, especially in the areas of deep bass
performance and very low noise. My reference VTL 7.5 line stage,
definitely a state-of-the-art contender that retails for $13.5K, also has
tube input/solid-state output architecture. I remember asking Luke Manley,
whose company's very name invokes glowing glass, about this. "We had set
some very ambitious performance goals for our flagship preamp that we
simply couldn't quite reach with an all-tube architecture," Luke replied. "So
we went with the best scheme that allowed us to accomplish all of our
goals."
Makes sense to me, increasingly, I think the historical
dichotomy between tube and transistor is blurring. Let's take the three
finest preamplifiers I have ever reviewed (listed in chronological
sequence): The $18K CTC Blowtorch is pure solid-state; the $13.5K VTL 7.5
is hybrid, similar to the SWL 9.0SE; the $30K (gulp!) WAVAC PR-T1 is all
tubes. While there are differences in their sonic presentations, any of
the three would be the crowning glory of a no-holds-barred reference
system. Dan Wright's new baby can stand tall with its pair of excellent
input tubes.
Speaking of babies, a quick aside: After pondering
fruitlessly for a while about the unit's nomenclature, I finally asked Dan
Wright to explain. Turns out he has named his first preamplifier in honor
of his first-born son: "SWL stands for Spencer Wright Linestage, and his
birth weight was 9.0 lbs." (No doubt young Spencer was also a Special
Edition!) That story just charms the heck out of me.
One
last thought before I leave the tube/transistor subject. My nomination for
"Clich้ overdue for retirement" is the statement that appears in
virtually every review of a tube preamplifier: "The Model XXX is notably
free from the overly soft/sweet/warm/dark/colored [take your pick] sound
so often associated with tube-based units" or words to that effect.
Yes there are differences, primarily in the nature of the harmonic
envelope, between tubes and solid-state designs. But for about the last 10
years, I'm hard-pressed to recall any good tube preamplifier whose sound
fitted that description. Yet I too have been guilty of those kinds of
statements. I pledge that in future I will mention the subject only when
the tube unit under review does have those old-style colorations!
Once-Over
The one-box SWL 9.0SE tips the scale at a solid 24 lbs;
the sheet-metal enclosure is cleanly finished, and the rear-panel RCA
jacks well spaced and clearly marked: 2 pairs MAIN OUT, for bi-amplifying
or feeding a powered subwoofer; four pairs Line Input; pairs for Tape Out
and Monitor; and an IEC electrical jack. The brushed aluminum fascia is
unassumingly attractive. The legend "ModWright Instruments" and logo badge
are lightly engraved into the fascia a classy touch. There are rotary
knobs for input selection, labeled CD, Tuner, DVD and HT/BP (home theater
bypass). The four toggle switches are labeled Power, Mute, Tape/Mon. and
HT/BP.
When the HT/BP switch is in the down/off position, the RCA
jacks associated with it function as normal line input jacks. When this
switch is up/active, the output from whatever component is connected to
those jacks (a home theater preamp/processor is assumed) will be fed
through the SWL 9.0SE with no processing or volume attenuation from the
preamplifier. One touch I particularly like is that when the unit is first
powered up, it is automatically muted for a 45-second warm-up and tube
stabilization period and the volume control is automatically reduced to
zero. Finally, the owner's manual thoughtfully provides the code for the
small universal-type remote wand, which enables remote mute and volume
adjustment.
The Listening Experience
Listening to this fine preamplifier was never less than
enjoyable. Even straight out of the box there was less grain and edge than
I typically hear from a new component before several hours of break-in.
The initial presentation actually came fairly close to meeting my
performance expectations, given the 9.0SE's price. But that momentary
impression did not last. Things were sounding better after just two or
three hours, and much better yet after an overnight interval on Repeat.
The presentation continued to show small incremental improvements over
another week or two, and finally, after 100+ hours of playing time, the
sound stabilized at a much more impressive level than I would have
thought likely at the start. Also worth mentioning is that from the very
beginning the 9.0SE has been almost spookily quiet even more so than
many solid-state preamplifiers.
A couple of random impressions: the 9.0SE's volume knob
has a nice, gradual scale that allows for very fine adjustments at the
lower listening levels. Also, the speed of change with the remote wand is
gradual, not abruptly too fast. Those are both good personality traits for
a preamp. The 9.0SE has proven to be easily compatible with the various
sources, tube and solid-state amplifiers, and loudspeakers heard through
it. Whatever the companion components, the sound is rhythmically lively,
fast and dynamic, tonally impeccable, and non-fatiguing in extended
sessions. It shows no imbalances or serious errors of commission, and I'm
hard-pressed to single out any important omission.
Except one, and I'm not sure how important it is. I am
pretty sensitive to correct polarity when listening to recorded music, and
I like to have remote polarity switching available for analog as well as
digital playback. For that reason I like having the switching capability
at the preamplifier. The SWL 9.0SE has neither remote nor mechanical
polarity change. But I don't hold that lack against it. It would be a
relatively expensive feature to add to any single-ended preamplifier,
especially in the $2K range. (Heck, that $30K WAVAC mentioned above doesn't
have any polarity switching either.) Fact is, many (most?) audiophiles don't
seem to give a damn about polarity, or for that matter, even understand
what it is. And I have to admit, with a preamp that sounds this good, even
out-of-polarity music still sounds fine.
Bottom Line Time
A while back, when I mentioned to Dan Wright that I was
working on this review, he asked how I would compare it to my reference
VTL 7.5. Well Dan, here's your answer. First, the VTL does have that
remote polarity switching I like. It's also more generously equipped with
single-ended and balanced connectivity, which makes it a somewhat better
equipped reviewer's tool. And, when I engage in concentrated critical
listening I seem to detect from the VTL a few very small advantages in
macro dynamics, soundscape sweep and scale, and ultimate bass depth. And
all for only six times more than the SWL 9.0SE!
Perhaps the best way I can state my regard for this unit
is to say that if I walked into a room with my system playing, and the ModWright
was in the place of my reference VTL preamplifier, in the
absence of any visual cues I doubt that I would notice the change for a
good while. The two preamplifiers seem to me to have more sonic
similarities than differences. The SWL9.0SE is easily the best
preamplifier I have heard anywhere near its price. In fact, I urge any
audiophile looking for a superior line stage to compare Dan Wright's
impressive creation against competitors costing three or four (or even
more) times its price. It's a winner, and I'm hanging on to this one.
There's always room at my place for a great preamp!
Specifications
Type: Stereo preamplifer
Frequency Response: 17Hz to 100kHz (+/-1dB)
Tube Complement: two 5687 tubes
Gain: 15dB
Input Impedance: 50 kOhm
Output Impedance: 600 Ohm
Weight: 24 lbs.
Dimensions: 17 x 12 x 4 (WxDxH in inches)
Warranty: 5 years parts and labor; 6 months on tubes. Warranty may be transferred to second owner.
Price: $2,200
Company Information
ModWright Instruments
21919 NE 399th St.
Amboy, WA 98601
E-mail: modwright@yahoo.com
Website: www.modwright.com